Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40097624›Full record

Observational studyCardiovascular and interventional radiology2025

Less Aortic Neck Dilatation of the ALTO Stent Graft compared to the Self-Expanding Stent Grafts after Endovascular Aortic Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Shigeo Ichihashi, Mitsuyoshi Takahara, Naoki Fujimura, Terutoshi Yamaoka, Hiroshi Banno, Masami Shingaki, Kazuo Shimamura, Fumiaki Kimura, Yoshihiko Kurimoto, Ken Nakazawa and 14 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational StudyComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Shigeo IchihashiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijocho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan. shigeoichivasc@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1809-4079
Mitsuyoshi TakaharaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Naoki FujimuraDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Terutoshi YamaokaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Ehime, Japan.
Hiroshi BannoDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Masami ShingakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kazuo ShimamuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Fumiaki KimuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kushiro Kojinkai Memorial Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Yoshihiko KurimotoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Ken NakazawaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Kiyomitsu YasuharaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Isesaki Municipal Hospital, Gunma, Japan.
Naoki ToyaDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yutaka KobayashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Uji Tokushukai Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshiaki SaitoDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan.
Tsuyoshi ShibataDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sapporo Medical University, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kenjiro KanekoDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Shin-Yurigaoka General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Shinsuke KotaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan.
Yamato TamuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nara Prefectural Seiwa Medical Center, Nara, Japan.
Seiji OnitsukaDepartment of Surgery, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Francesco BolstadDepartment of Clinical English, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Shinichi IwakoshiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijocho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Shoji SakaguchiDepartment of Radiology, Matsubara Tokushukai Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Toshihiro TanakaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijocho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Kimihiko KichikawaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijocho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProximal neck dilatation (PND) is a common issue after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), being a potential cause of stent graft migration or type Ia endoleak. The ALTO stent graft, featuring a unique polymer sealing mechanism, has been reported to exhibit less PND. This study aims to compare PND and clinical outcomes between the ALTO stent graft and alternative self-expanding stent grafts.

methodsThe CustomSEAL study is a multi-center retrospective observational study involving 18 institutions in Japan. It compares EVAR outcomes using the ALTO stent graft and alternative self-expanding stent grafts for fusiform AAAs. The primary outcome measure was the difference in PND at 12 months post-EVAR. Secondary outcome measures included aneurysm sac diameter changes, reintervention rates, and mortality outcomes during the follow-up.

resultsAfter propensity score matching, 111 patient pairs were extracted. Baseline characteristics, including proximal neck length/diameter and stent graft oversizing, were comparable between groups. The ALTO stent graft was associated with significantly less PND at 12 months (2.3% vs. 26.7%, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in perioperative outcomes, aneurysm sac diameter changes, reintervention rates, or overall survival between the groups.

conclusionsThe ALTO stent graft demonstrated significantly less PND at 12 months post-EVAR compared to alternative self-expanding stent grafts, highlighting its potential advantage in exerting less chronic expanding force on the proximal aortic neck. Long-term follow-up is needed to validate the clinical benefits of the ALTO stent graft over the alternative self-expanding stent grafts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalBlood Vessel ProsthesisBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEndovascular ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsStentsAgedAged, 80 and overDilatation, PathologicEndovascular Aneurysm RepairFemaleHumansJapanMaleProsthesis DesignRetrospective Studiesabdominal aortic aneurysmsendovascular aneurysm repairproximal neck dilatation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.