ArticleScientific reports2025
Addressing data imbalance in collision risk prediction with active generative oversampling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data imbalance is a critical factor affecting the predictive accuracy in collision risk assessment. This study proposes an advanced active generative oversampling method based on Query by Committee (QBC) and Auxiliary Classifier Generative Adversarial Network (ACGAN), integrated with the Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network (WGAN) framework. Our method selectively enriches minority class samples through QBC and diversity metrics to enhance the diversity of sample generation, thereby improving the performance of fault classification algorithms. By equating the labels of selected samples to those of real samples, we increase the accuracy of the discriminator, forcing the generator to produce more diverse outputs, which is expected to improve classification results. We also propose a method for dynamically adjusting the training epochs of the generator and discriminator based on loss differences to achieve balance in model training. Empirical analysis on four publicly available imbalanced datasets shows that our method outperforms existing methods in terms of precision, recall, F-measure, and G-mean. Specifically, our method's results are above 0.92 on all evaluation indicators, with an average improvement of 23-28.3% compared to the worst-performing ENN method. This indicates that our method has a significant advantage in handling data imbalance, being able to more accurately identify collision samples and reduce the misclassification rate of non-collision samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.