ArticleScientific reports2025
MB based RT-qPCR increase the clinical application of cfEBV DNA for NPC in non-endemic area of China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research progress on the regulation of ferroptosis in NPC (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To compare the performance of magnetic bead (MB) and the concentrated precipitation (CP) based RT-qPCR to qualify cell free EBV DNA (cfEBV DNA) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in non-endemic area of China. From January 2014 to June 2024, a retrospective analysis of 2 cohort studies on cfEBV DNA in NPC patients was conducted to assess the diagnostic value, positive detection rate and clinical application. cfEBV DNA detection with CP based RT-qPCR in cohort 1 and MB based RT-qPCR method in cohort 2. The MB based RT-qPCR for the quantitative measurement of cfEBV DNA load was higher than the CP based RT-qPCR in the same plasma samples from NPC patients (P < 0.001). CP based RT-qPCR measured cfEBV DNA in 1405 NPC and 244 healthy controls in cohort 1 with 40.8% sensitivity (AUC = 0.704, 95% CI: 0.676-0.731). In cohort 2(683 naive NPC and 303 controls), cfEBV DNA had a sensitivity of 75.84% (AUC = 0.879, 95% CI: 0.86-0.90). There were no significant differences in TNM stage among NPC between the two cohorts (P > 0.05). The MB method considerably increased the positive detection rate of cfEBV DNA in NPCs at stages III-IV, T2-T4, N1-N3, and M0 (P < 0.001). At the end of treatment, 97.51% of patients had no detectable EBV and just 2.49% had detectable cfEBV DNA. Those who received ≤ 2 or ≥ 3 cycles of NAC had a median t
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.