ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of factors influencing the psychological status and cognitive function of postoperative head and neck tumor patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Living with knowledge gap and psychological burdens: understanding the attitudes, barriers, and support needs for pulmonary rehabilitation among oral and maxillofacial cancer patients in China.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim was to analyze the factors influencing the psychological status and cognitive function in postoperative head and neck tumor (HNT) patients. 170 patients, including 90 benign HNT (BHNT) patients and 80 malignant HNT (MHNT) patients, were included in this study. Psychological status was evaluated using the distress thermometer. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Multiple Ability Self-Reported Questionnaire. The psychological status and cognitive function were both statistically significantly better in BHNT patients than in MHNT patients (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). MHNT patients in the moderate and severe appearance defect groups had a higher incidence of psychological distress than those in the no facial appearance defect group (P = 0.006 and P = 0.011, respectively). Both BHNT and MHNT patients in the group under the age of 60 had a higher incidence of psychological distress than those in the group over the age of 60 (P = 0.017 and P = 0.017, respectively). Educational level of both BHNT and MHNT patients was negatively correlated with the extent of cognitive impairment (P = 0.012 and P = 0.004, respectively). The influence of postoperative time on the psychological condition varied in different groups. Postoperative time of both BHNT and MHNT patients was negatively correlated with the extent of cognitive impairment (P = 0.027 and P < 0.001, respectively).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.