ArticleScientific reports2025
COVID-19 health data prediction: a critical evaluation of CNN-based approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood biomarker trajectories in ICU-directed prediction models - A scoping review.The EPMA journal · 2026Review
- AI-driven big data analysis and predictive modeling of infectious disease immunity: from correlates to causal, multiscale understanding.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- A real-time early warning system to anticipate respiratory disease outbreaks using transfer learning.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Bridging Traditional Modeling and Artificial Intelligence in Measles Epidemiology: Methods, Applications, and Future Directions-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Severe viral rash progression prediction and surveillance early warning based on local-global attention and temporal convolutional network.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Deep learning assisted LDPC decoding for 5G IoT networks in fading environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An innovative Squid Game Optimizer for enhanced channel estimation and massive MIMO detection using dilated adaptive RNNs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Leveraging data analytics to revolutionize cybersecurity with machine learning and deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Improving CNN predictive accuracy in COVID-19 health analytics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning approach for automated hMPV classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AI Methods Tailored to Influenza, RSV, HIV, and SARS-CoV-2: A Focused Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Hybrid AI and semiconductor approaches for power quality improvement.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly accelerated the demand for accurate and efficient prediction models to support effective disease management, containment strategies, and informed decision-making. Predictive models capable of analyzing complex health data are essential for monitoring disease trends, evaluating risk factors, and optimizing resource allocation during the pandemic. Among various machine learning approaches, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have emerged as powerful tools due to their ability to process large volumes of high-dimensional health data, such as medical images, time-series data, and patient demographics, with impressive precision. This research seeks to systematically examine the challenges and limitations inherent in utilizing CNNs for COVID-19 health data prediction, offering a comprehensive perspective grounded in data science research. Key areas of investigation include issues related to data quality and availability, such as incomplete, noisy, and imbalanced datasets, which often hinder the training of robust models. Additionally, architectural constraints of CNNs, including their sensitivity to hyperparameter tuning and reliance on substantial computational resources, are explored as critical bottlenecks that impact scalability and efficiency. A significant focus is placed on generalization challenges, where models trained on specific datasets struggle to adapt to unseen data from diverse populations or clinical settings, limiting their applicability in real-world scenarios. The study further highlights a reported accuracy of 63%, underscoring the need for improved methodologies to enhance model performance and reliability. By addressing these challenges, this research aims to provide actionable insights and practical recommendations to optimize the use of CNNs for COVID-19 health data prediction. In particular, the study emphasizes the importance of incorporating advanced strategies such as transfer learning, data augmentation, and regularization techniques to overcome dataset limitations and enhance model robustness. The integration of multimodal approaches combining medical images with auxiliary data, such as patient demographics and laboratory results, is proposed to improve contextual understanding and diagnostic precision. Finally, the research underscores the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration, leveraging domain expertise from data scientists, healthcare professionals, and epidemiologists to develop holistic solutions for tackling the complexities of COVID-19 prediction. By shedding light on the limitations and potential of CNNs in this domain, this study aims to guide researchers and practitioners in making informed decisions about model design, implementation, and optimization. Ultimately, it contributes to advancing AI-driven diagnostics and predictive modeling for COVID-19 and other public health crises, fostering the development of scalable and reliable tools for better healthcare outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.