ArticleScientific reports2025
Applying machine learning algorithms to explore the impact of combined noise and dust on hearing loss in occupationally exposed populations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applying Machine Learning Models to Predict Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Noise & healthPooled it
- Association between combined occupational exposure to coal dust and noise and high-frequency hearing loss among workers: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Effects of occupational dust exposure on the health status of workers in China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancing Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Risk Assessment in the Era of Large-Scale Data.Noise & healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the combined impacts of occupational noise and dust on hearing and extra-auditory functions and identify associated risk factors via machine learning techniques. Data from 14,145 workers (627 with occupational noise-induced hearing loss (ONIHL)) at Hebei Medical Examination Center (2017-2023) were analyzed. Workers with combined exposure and without specific contraindications or other hearing impairment causes were included. Demographic and clinical data were gathered. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests examined variables, and multivariate logistic regression determined ONIHL risk factors. Machine learning algorithms like Logistic Regression and Random Forest were developed, optimized, and evaluated. Results showed significant differences in gender, exposure, blood pressure, smoking, etc. between ONIHL and non-ONIHL groups. Male gender, combined exposure, diastolic blood pressure elevation, smoking, fasting blood glucose elevation, and age were positive predictors, while systolic blood pressure elevation was negative. The logistic model had the highest predictive ability (ROC = 0.714). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant positive correlation in specific subgroups. In summary, combined exposure increased ONIHL risk and affected health. Machine learning effectively predicted ONIHL, but the study had limitations and needed further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.