ArticleScientific reports2025
Simulation and experimental study of shell-kernel separation device for household sunflower based on CFD-DEM coupling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to improve the separation efficiency of shell and kernel in a household-type sunflower seed sheller. The coupled research method of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Discrete Element Method (DEM) was employed to simulate the shell-kernel separation process in the air channel. The main function of this shell-kernel separation device is to separate sunflower seed shells from sunflower kernels using airflow. This enables the dehulling of sunflower seeds, preparing them for subsequent processing or consumption.The air channel structure was optimized by analyzing pressure and velocity cloud images to enhance the separation efficiency. Comparison was made between the results of physical validation experiments and simulation experiments, including the shell and kernel separation rate, loss rate, and wind speed at the outlet. The P-values of the T-tests were less than 0.05 and the relative errors were all less than 3.00%, which proved the accuracy of the simulation experiments. Using shell kernel separation rate and loss rate as evaluation indexes, and air channel angle and wind speed as research objects, a single-factor experiment was conducted and the optimal range of each factor was determined. Based on the results of the single-factor experiments, orthogonal experiments were conducted, and the optimal combination of operating parameters for the device was determined using a comprehensive scoring method. A bench-scale validation experiment was conducted to verify the optimal combination of operational parameters. The results showed that, under the conditions of a wind speed of 6 m/s and an airway angle of 31°, the shell kernel separation rate reached 89.91%, with a loss rate of 6.24%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.