Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40097517›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The biological soundscape of temperate reefs in the Wadden sea.

Maryann S Watson, Annebelle C M Kok, Ilse van Opzeeland, Britas Klemens Eriksson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maryann S WatsonGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. m.s.watson@rug.nl.
Annebelle C M KokGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Ilse van OpzeelandOcean Acoustics Lab, Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, Alfred-Wegener Institute, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570, Bremerhaven, Germany.
Britas Klemens ErikssonGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring coastal marine habitats presents many challenges. Often, using multiple approaches to capture different aspects of ecosystems can strengthen the information gained regarding habitat status. The use of passive acoustics to document, describe, and monitor coastal habitats through soundscapes presents one such complementary technique. Marine soundscapes have not yet been described for the Wadden Sea; an ecosystem where reef habitats have experienced major changes over time due to various human-mediated impacts. Recordings at a subtidal shellfish reef and neighbouring sandflat at six 2-week periods over a 14 month period in 2021 and 2022 provide a first catalogue of biotic acoustic signatures in this ecosystem. Furthermore, recordings from two natural reef sites were compared to recordings from two recently deployed artificial reef sites, showing similar patterns of greater biotic acoustic diversity at the natural and artificial reefs compared to nearby sandflats. These results demonstrate that fine-scale differences in habitat soundscapes exist across reef habitats within small geographic scales. This study provides the foundations for further quantitative research using PAM to monitor soundscape dynamics of the Wadden Sea and understanding the role of sound in changing coastal ecosystems.

Indexed as

Coral ReefsSoundAcousticsAnimalsEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringOceans and SeasCoastalPassive acoustic monitoringReefsSoundscapeWadden sea

Identifiers

PMID40097517
PMCPMC11914458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.