Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40097499›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Ground truth clustering is not the optimum clustering.

Lucia Absalom Bautista, Timotej Hrga, Janez Povh, Shudian Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucia Absalom BautistaUniversity of Sevilla, C. San Fernando 4, Seville, 41004, Spain.
Timotej HrgaInstitut für Mathematik, Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Universitätstraße 65-67, Klagenfurt, 9020, Austria.
Janez PovhFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 6, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia. janez.povh@rudolfovo.eu.
Shudian ZhaoDepartment of Mathematics, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Lindtstedtsvägen 25, Stockholm, 100 44, Sweden. shudian@kth.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data clustering is a fundamental yet challenging task in data science. The minimum sum-of-squares clustering (MSSC) problem aims to partition data points into k clusters to minimize the sum of squared distances between the points and their cluster centers (centroids). Despite being NP-hard, solvers exist that can compute optimal solutions for small to medium-sized datasets. One such solver is SOS-SDP, a branch-and-bound algorithm based on semidefinite programming. We used it to obtain optimal MSSC solutions (optimum clusterings) for various k across multiple datasets with known ground truth clusterings. We evaluated the alignment between the optimum and ground truth clusterings using six extrinsic measures and assessed their quality using three intrinsic measures. The results reveal that the optimum clusterings often differ significantly from the ground truth clusterings. Additionally, the optimum clusterings frequently outperform the ground truth clusterings, according to the intrinsic measures that we used. However, when ground truth clusters are well-separated convex shapes, such as ellipsoids, the optimum and ground truth clusterings closely align.

Indexed as

Extrinsic measuresGround truth clusteringIntrinsic measuresMinimum sum-of-squares clustering

Identifiers

PMID40097499
PMCPMC11914496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.