ArticleScientific reports2025
Ground truth clustering is not the optimum clustering.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data clustering is a fundamental yet challenging task in data science. The minimum sum-of-squares clustering (MSSC) problem aims to partition data points into k clusters to minimize the sum of squared distances between the points and their cluster centers (centroids). Despite being NP-hard, solvers exist that can compute optimal solutions for small to medium-sized datasets. One such solver is SOS-SDP, a branch-and-bound algorithm based on semidefinite programming. We used it to obtain optimal MSSC solutions (optimum clusterings) for various k across multiple datasets with known ground truth clusterings. We evaluated the alignment between the optimum and ground truth clusterings using six extrinsic measures and assessed their quality using three intrinsic measures. The results reveal that the optimum clusterings often differ significantly from the ground truth clusterings. Additionally, the optimum clusterings frequently outperform the ground truth clusterings, according to the intrinsic measures that we used. However, when ground truth clusters are well-separated convex shapes, such as ellipsoids, the optimum and ground truth clusterings closely align.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.