ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of an immune signature-based risk model for prognostic assessment in melanoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Melanoma is a highly invasive malignancy with poor prognoses in advanced stages. Developing a risk model that can accurately assess prognosis and guide personalized treatment is crucial for improving the clinical management of melanoma. This study aims to develop and validate an immune-based prognostic risk model for melanoma through comprehensive bioinformatics analysis. We collected transcriptomic data from multiple public databases and identified 9 immune features significantly associated with prognosis using single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) and Cox regression. These features were utilized to construct the risk model, which was subsequently validated using relevant bulk transcriptomic datasets and single-cell transcriptomic datasets from the GEO database, encompassing diverse patient populations and sample types. The model effectively stratified patients into high-risk and low-risk groups with distinct survival outcomes. Further analysis revealed significant associations between the risk model and genomic heterogeneity indicators, such as tumor mutational burden (TMB), loss of heterozygosity (LOH), and immune checkpoint gene expression. The model robustness was confirmed using single-cell transcriptomic data, highlighting key genes with potential therapeutic relevance. Our findings provide a reliable prognostic tool and novel insights for personalized melanoma treatment, emphasizing the need for further clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.