ArticleScientific reports2025
Disproportionality analysis of post-marketing safety concerns associated with selumetinib in the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selumetinib as a Target Therapy in Progressive Paediatric Low-Grade Gliomas-Case Series (pLGG).Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2026Article
- Management of adverse events in patients with pediatric low-grade glioma treated with MAPK-directed therapies: Delphi consensus recommendations and unmet needs.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
- A Nonparametric Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Selumetinib in Pediatric Patients Diagnosed With Neurofibromatosis-I or Plexiform Neurofibromas.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Pharmacovigilance assessment of drug-induced aplastic anemia: analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The FDA has granted approval for the use of selumetinib in the treatment of pediatric patients who are at least 2 years old and have neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) with symptomatic, inoperable plexiform neurofibromas (PN). Nevertheless, the safety of selumetinib over an extended period of time in sizable cohorts remains uncertain. The objective of the present study was to assess the adverse events (AEs) associated with selumetinib by analyzing data from the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS). The FAERS database was retrospectively queried to extract reports associated with selumetinib from the third quarter of 2020 to the first quarter of 2024. To identify and evaluate potential AEs in patients receiving selumetinib, various disproportionality analyses such as the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) were employed. A total of 546 reports of selumetinib as the "primary suspected (PS)" and 1437 cases of selumetinib-induced AEs were identified. 42 AE signals were detected at the preferred term (PT) level after complying with four algorithms simultaneously. Commonly significant signals for cardiotoxicity, ocular toxicity, skin toxicity, and increased creatine phosphokinase have been observed. Additionally, previously reported AE signals such as proteinuria were detected. Most AEs related to selumetinib occur within the first month after the initiation of therapy. Our study improves the comprehension of selumetinib's safety profile by offering a thorough analysis of the adverse events (AEs) recorded post-marketing. These findings highlight the necessity of ongoing surveillance to detect and assess any adverse events linked to selumetinib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.