ArticleScientific reports2025
Mental health outcomes following a four week online training on social emotional and ethical learning for public school teachers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reducing teachers' perceived stress through an online wellbeing intervention: the role of socio-emotional competence and self-efficacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a 4-week social, emotional and ethical learning online training (SEELOT) on public school teachers' stress, well-being, social-emotional learning literacy, positive and negative emotions, attention, motivation, and frustration, and to assess the impact on their classes and personal lives. During the Covid-19 pandemic, teachers from public schools in Brazil (N = 333) were invited to participate and were divided into two groups: an active group (SEELOT) and a waiting-list group (WLC). They were evaluated before and after one month. A robust trimmed means ANOVA was used for data analysis. The SEELOT group showed improvements in their well-being, attention, motivation, and frustration, and decreased their stress levels compared to the WLC group. Additionally, a subset of the active group participated in semi-structured interviews and reported developing new skills and knowledge related to human values, emotional management, and the ability to handle the challenges of education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.