ArticleScientific reports2025
Risk factors for non-responsiveness to 5-aminosalicylic acid in patients with ulcerative colitis identified using retrospective clinical study and Mendelian randomization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to identify risk factors and potential targets associated with non-responsiveness to 5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients with mild to moderate UC were grouped based on their responsiveness to 5-ASA. Regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for non-responsiveness, while Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was used to evaluate the potential targets. Among 50 patients (11 non-responders and 39 responders), non-responders exhibited higher incidences of fever, back pain, allergy history, and ankylosing spondylitis, as well as elevated monocyte count and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, but a lower aspartate aminotransferase-to-ALT (AST/ALT) ratio (all P < 0.05). Allergy history was a risk factor (OR 140.50, P = 0.021), while a high AST/ALT ratio was a protective factor (OR 0.001, P = 0.023) for non-responsiveness. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the AST/ALT ratio was 0.80. MR analysis showed that inhibition of the inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit alpha (CHUK) by 5-ASA, targeting ALT, increased the risk of UC (OR 1.02, P = 0.002). Our findings suggested that allergy history and the AST/ALT ratio were associated with non-responsiveness to 5-ASA, and CHUK was identified as a potential target for ALT-related non-responsiveness.Trial Registration: ChiCTR2400084086|| http://www.chictr.org.cn/ , Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, 2024-05-10.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.