Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40097459›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evading control flow graph based GNN malware detectors via active opcode insertion method with maliciousness preserving.

Hao Peng, Zehao Yu, Dandan Zhao, Zhiguo Ding, Jieshuai Yang, Bo Zhang, Jianming Han, Xuhong Zhang, Shouling Ji, Ming Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hao PengCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Zehao YuCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Dandan ZhaoCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Zhiguo DingCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Jieshuai YangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Bo ZhangSchool of Cyber Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jianming HanCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
Xuhong ZhangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Shouling JiCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ming ZhongCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China. zhongming@zjnu.edu.cn.

Funding

Department of Education of Zhejiang Province Y202353702Jinhua Science and Technology Plan 2023-1-091National Natural Science Foundation of China 62072412Zhejiang Province Science Foundation LD24F020002Zhejiang Province Science Foundation LQ24F020025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the continuous advancement of machine learning, numerous malware detection methods that leverage this technology have emerged, presenting new challenges to the generation of adversarial malware. Existing function-preserving adversarial attacks fall short of effectively modifying portable executable (PE) malware control flow graphs (CFGs), thereby failing to bypass the graph neural network (GNN) models that utilize CFGs for detection. To solve this issue, we introduce a novel base modification method called active opcode insertion, which modifies PE CFGs while preserving functionality by inserting a processed sequence of benign and jump opcodes to connect with the original base block. Using reinforcement learning, MalAOI identifies optimal insertion points and benign opcode sequences to autonomously generate adversarial malware that evades GNN model detection. We tested our approach on the BODMAS and SOREL-20M datasets, and the results demonstrate that MalAOI-generated adversarial malware achieves an average evasion rate of 93.73% against the GNN detection model, with only 12.87% increase in byte size.

Indexed as

Control Flow GraphsFunction-preservingGraph Neural NetworksMalware DetectionReinforcement Learning

Identifiers

PMID40097459
PMCPMC11914434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.