ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced multi agent coordination algorithm for drone swarm patrolling in durian orchards.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Developments and Applications of Drone Swarm: Techniques, Strategies, and Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Heterogeneous agricultural robots: a review of collaborative sensing and control, challenges and opportunities.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Quantum-enhanced artificial potential field method for robust drone swarm shape formation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Secure and Intelligent Low-Altitude Infrastructures: Synergistic Integration of IoT Networks, AI Decision-Making and Blockchain Trust Mechanisms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Toward Autonomous UAV Swarm Navigation: A Review of Trajectory Design Paradigms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes an enhanced multi-agent swarm control algorithm (EN-MASCA) to solve the problem of efficient patrolling of drone swarms in complex durian orchard environments. It introduces a virtual navigator model to dynamically adjust the patrol path of the drone swarm and perform obstacle avoidance and path optimization in real time according to environmental changes. Different from traditional algorithms that only rely on fixed path planning, the virtual navigator model significantly improves the flexibility and stability of the drone swarm in complex environments. It also applies deep reinforcement learning algorithms to path planning and obstacle avoidance of drone swarms for the first time, improving the algorithm's adaptability and optimization capabilities by learning dynamic information in complex environments. This innovation significantly improves the applicability of existing methods in complex terrain and dynamic obstacle environments. Finally, it incorporates the simulation characteristics of biological swarm behavior, and on this basis, comprehensively optimizes the flight path, obstacle avoidance and swarm stability of the drone swarm. By improving control strategies and parameter design, it improves the trajectory consistency and mission completion efficiency of the UAV swarm during flight. In the experimental part, this study verified in detail the advantages of the EN-MASCA algorithm in terms of flight trajectory, flight stability, cluster consistency and task completion efficiency by constructing a six-degree-of-freedom UAV motion simulation model and real environment simulation. It provides an efficient and intelligent solution for collaborative patrol operations of drones in durian orchards, which has important practical application value and promotion prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.