ArticleScientific reports2025
Abnormal heart sound recognition using SVM and LSTM models in real-time mode.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty quantification-based DMEFNet for reliable modelling of heart sound signals.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Heart Sound Classification with MFCCs and Wavelet Daubechies Analysis Using Machine Learning Algorithms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A dataset of heart sound regurgitation of patients with heart valve disorders.Data in brief · 2025Article
- A systematic review on deep learning in ventricular septal defect screening, diagnosis, and management.Annals of pediatric cardiologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are non-communicable diseases that are considered the leading cause of death worldwide accounting for 17.9 million fatalities. Auscultation of heart sounds is the most common and valuable way of diagnosing heart diseases. Normal heart sounds have a special rhythmic pattern as an indicator of heart integrity. Many experts concentrate on diagnosing the heart by automatic digital auscultation systems which find various distinguishable characteristics for heart sound classifications. This can decrease the mortality rate for cardiovascular diseases and enhance the patient's quality of life. This study aims to propose a real-time heart sound recognition system to classify both normal and abnormal phonocardiograms with the ability to define the abnormality type if existed. Digital signal processing methods, by applying the fast Fourier transform, filtering techniques, and the dual-tree complex wavelet transform, with machine learning classification algorithms are employed to segment the input phonocardiogram signal, extract meaningful features, and find the appropriate class for the input signal. We utilized three datasets, the PhysioNet of 1395, the GitHub of 800, and the PASCAL of 100 files segmented into three cardiac cycles. The proposed solution relies on the support vector machine and the long-short term memory neural network to distinguish between normal and abnormal heartbeat sounds and to recognize the type of abnormality (in the case distinguished) respectively. The results show that the proposed approach for normal/abnormal classification achieves an overall accuracy of 96.0 and 98.1%, sensitivity of 94.4 and 84.2%, and specificity of 64.9 and 98.4% for two and one support vector machines respectively among the state-of-the-art solutions. The long short-term memory model is also a well-known efficient classifier for temporal data, and the results show the accuracy of 99.2, 99.5, 98.6, and 99.4% for four (aortic stenosis (AS), mitral regurgitation (MR), mitral stenosis (MS), and mitral valve prolapse (MVP)), five (AS, MR, MS, MVP, and normal), six (AS, MR, MS, MVP, extrahls, and extrasystole), and seven classes (AS, MR, MS, MVP, extrahls, extrasystole, and normal). Furthermore, we found an efficient automatic segmentation method that was tested with the PASCAL database achieving a total error of 867,525.6 and 23,590.3 ms for datasets A and B respectively, with a computational time of 0.04 s to segment one cardiac cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.