ArticleBDJ open2025
Comparative evaluation on the masking ability of different tooth colored restoration over blackish discoloration caused by 38% silver diamine fluoride: an in -vitro study.
Article in BDJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Tooth-colored Restorative Materials in Masking Discoloration Caused by Silver Diamine Fluoride: A Systematic Review ofInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026Review
- A novel Pulp Caries GAN multi loss GAN with new pulp inspired metaheuristics for pediatric dental caries detection and segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe application of Silver diamine fluoride is an effective approach in controlling dental caries. But the black discoloration caused by its application is unaesthetic and is of greater concern to the parents.
aimTo assess the potential color masking ability of tooth colored restorative material over discoloration caused by 38% SDF using a UV‒VIS-NIR spectrophotometer. MATERIAL AND
methods20 extracted teeth were taken and randomly divided into 4 groups: Group A: 38% SDF + GIC; Group B: 38% SDF + RMGIC; Group C: 38% SDF+ Composite; Group D: 38% SDF+ Cention N. Two readings were recorded, one on application of 38% SDF and second after application of test materials using a UV‒VIS-NIR spectrophotometer.
resultThe intragroup comparison for color masking ability (ΔE) for all four restorative materials revealed no statistically significant differences, with a test value of 1.168 and a p value of 0.353, and the highest mean was observed in Group A, i.e., 38% SDF + GIC (9.171966) Significant differences in color were observed, with more shifts toward yellow in group A (2.488 ± 2.957) and group D (1.686 ± 0.559) and more shifts toward green in groups B (-0.088 ± 0.34) and C (-0.062 ± 0.5). The mean lightness was greatest for Group C, i.e., the composite group (86.396 ± 3.741), and least for Group A, i.e., the GIC group (76.664 ± 8.213).
conclusionAll 4 restorative materials were equally effective in terms of color masking over 38% SDF discoloration.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.