ArticleBDJ open2025
Do CAD-CAM fibre posts exhibit higher bond strength and fracture resistance than other types of posts? systematic review with network meta-analysis of in-vitro studies.
Article in BDJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fracture strength of roots restored with relined and milled glass fiber posts.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPre-fabricated fibre posts facilitate post-endodontic restoration of endodontically treated teeth with insufficient coronal tooth structure. Recent advancements in digital dentistry have led to the introduction of custom-made fibre posts fabricated with computer-aided design-computer-aided manufactured (CAD-CAM) technology. However, evidence on the comparative performance of the different post-types is lacking. This systematic review with network meta-analysis aimed to analyse the current evidence on in-vitro studies comparing bond strength, catastrophic failures, fracture resistance, and cement film thickness between CAD-CAM fibre posts and other post types, including pre-fabricated fibre and custom-made cast-metal posts. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Studies for in-vitro studies from inception until December 2023 (PROSPERO: CRD42024501614). Network meta-analysis and pairwise meta-analysis were performed. The ranking was performed using the surface area under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) guidelines.
resultsSeven hundred forty-one articles were identified, of which 80 duplicates were removed, and 585 were excluded by screening the titles and abstracts. A total of 76 articles were assessed by full-text reading, and 16 were included in the quantitative synthesis. CAD-CAM fibre posts (SMD = 1.09 [95% CI: 0.01, 2.17]) P = 0.04 demonstrated higher bond strength when compared to pre-fabricated posts. CAD-CAM fibre posts (RR = 0.39 [95% CI: 0.23, 0.69]) P < 0.05 demonstrated a lower risk for catastrophic failures when compared to pre-fabricated fibre posts.
conclusionsIn-vitro studies demonstrated that CAD-CAM fibre posts demonstrated higher bond strength, lower catastrophic failure rates, and similar fracture resistance compared to pre-fabricated and cast metal posts. The data on bond strength and catastrophic failures of CAD-CAM fibre posts must be validated clinically by high-quality, randomised, controlled clinical trials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.