ArticleThe clinical teacher2025
The Mentoring Circuit: An Innovative Speed-Dating Approach to Support Career Awareness in Speech and Language Therapy.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional placements in speech and language therapy (SLT) courses pose challenges for students to gain exposure and exchange knowledge within a wide range of specialties in the profession. To counteract this, we piloted an innovative 'mentoring circuit' to provide an online opportunity for student and newly qualified SLTs to gain insights and network. APPROACH: Mentees and mentors were recruited through professional networks and snowball sampling methods. Six working SLTs from different specialties volunteered as 'mentors' and were allocated individual breakout rooms on Zoom. Students, 'mentees', were grouped according to SLT stages, were given the opportunity to ask questions to each specialist in 10-min intervals. Each group of mentees were rotated along the circuit until they met all six specialists. Feedback was obtained via an online questionnaire. EVALUATION: Fifteen mentees (67% students, 33% newly qualified SLTs) attended. Key themes emerged from mentees' feedback, including the value of learning from a diverse range of specialists, benefits of peer learning and optimal mentees-mentor ratio. Suggestions included additional time for follow-up questions. Mentors also reported positive experiences, expressing enjoyment in sharing knowledge, networking opportunities, opportunities to reflect and appreciation for the circuit's format. They suggested additional time per breakout room and receiving questions in advance. IMPLICATIONS: Feedback showed that the mentoring circuit effectively provided insights and facilitated the sharing of clinical practices among participants. Both mentees and mentors reported positive experiences, indicating a mutually beneficial mentoring relationship. This approach can be considered by other healthcare professions to support clinical placement learning during the students' degree.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.