Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40097181›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Neural Dynamics of Reselecting Visual and Motor Contents in Working Memory after External Interference.

Daniela Gresch, Larissa Behnke, Freek van Ede, Anna C Nobre, Sage E P Boettcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Motor Control Processes Moderate Visual Working Memory Gating.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniela GreschDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9072-4958
Larissa BehnkeDepartment of Psychology, Universität Zürich, Zürich 8050, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0003-1593-4615
Freek van EdeInstitute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7434-1751
Anna C NobreDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5762-2802
Sage E P BoettcherDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom sage.boettcher@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0338-0646

Funding

Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging / Wellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/ZWellcome TrustWellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award 04571/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In everyday tasks, we must often shift our focus away from internal representations held in working memory to engage with perceptual events in the external world. Here, we investigated how our internal focus is reestablished following an interrupting task by tracking the reselection of visual representations and their associated action plans in working memory. Specifically, we asked whether reselection occurs for both visual and motor memory attributes and when this reselection occurs. We developed a visual-motor working-memory task in which participants were retrospectively cued to select one of two memory items before being interrupted by a perceptual discrimination task. To determine what information was reselected, the memory items had distinct visual and motor attributes. To determine when internal representations were reselected, the interrupting task was presented at one of three distinct time points following the retro-cue. We employed electroencephalography time-frequency analyses to track the initial selection and later reselection of visual and motor representations, as operationalized through modulations of posterior alpha (8-12 Hz) activity relative to the memorized item location (visual) and of central beta (13-30 Hz) activity relative to the required response hand (motor). Our results show that internal visual and motor contents were concurrently reselected immediately after completing the interrupting task, rather than only when internal information was required for memory-guided behavior. Thus, following interruption, we swiftly resume our internal focus in working memory through the simultaneous reselection of memorized visual representations and their associated action plans, thereby restoring internal contents to a ready-to-use state.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermPsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionAdultCuesElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung Adultaction planningattentionEEGinterferenceneural oscillationsworking memory

Identifiers

PMID40097181
PMCPMC12044030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.