ArticleLa Tunisie medicale2025
Article in La Tunisie medicale, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLipoid pneumonia is a rare disease affecting adults' which frequency increases with age. Exogenous lipoid pneumonia results from the penetration, usually by inhalation, of oily substances into the pulmonary parenchyma.
aimTo study the clinical and radiological features of exogenous lipoid pneumonia and to define therapeutic strategies.
methodsWe performed a monocentric, retrospective study of patients followed in the Pneumology Department of the Hedi Chaker Hospital in Sfax between 2004 and 2023. The diagnosis of exogenous lipoid pneumonia was confirmed by bronchoalveolar lavage with positive Oil Red O staining or by biopsy with anatomopathological examination showing lipid-laden foamy histiocytes.
resultsDuring this period, we collected nine patients with an average age of 46. Dyspnea and cough were the most frequent symptoms. Chest computed tomography revealed ground-glass opacity in five cases, parenchymal condensations in three cases and crazy paving in three cases. The frequent risk factors were occupational exposure to a lipid in five cases and consumption of a lipid product in four cases. In terms of treatment, four patients underwent occupational reclassification and a declaration of occupational disease. Systemic corticotherapy was indicated in six patients.
conclusionExogenous lipoid pneumonia is a rare entity. This study highlights the difficulty of making a diagnosis, due to misleading clinico-radiological presentation in the absence of exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.