Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40096640›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2025

The strength of organ, tissue, and body field effects determines the frequency of all neoplasia.

Piet C de Groen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Piet C de GroenDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2560-1254

Funding

REAL-TIME FEEDBACK TO IMPROVE COLONOSCOPYR01DK106130 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DE GROEN, PIET C · 2016 to 2019
$2.8M
Academic Health Center, University of MinnesotaNIDDK NIH HHS DK106130NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK106130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1953, Danely Slaughter proposed the concept of field cancerization, or field effect, to explain the development of additional neoplasia of similar type. A recent theory (de Groen, 2022) states that all DNA is exposed to a constant source of damage, resulting in a constant rate of germline and somatic DNA mutations. If the field effect and constant mutation theories are correct and a single somatic mutation causes the transition from non-neoplastic to neoplastic phenotype, then all rates of neoplasia formation can be modeled by exponential equations containing a single variable that determines the chance of phenotype transition. In this perspective, studies from 1953 till 2021 originating from America, Europe, and Asia about head, chest, abdomen, pelvic, and skin neoplasia were reviewed and showed consistent field effects that are modeled by tapering exponential equations containing a single variable defining field effect strength; Pearson and linear correlation coefficients for observed and modeled data range from 0.994 to 1. Thus, existing data are compatible with a constant rate of DNA damage. Organ-specific, tissue-specific, or body-wide mutagenesis conditions determine the rate of neoplasia development and explain the co-occurrence of seemingly unrelated neoplasia at predictable frequencies. Shared risk factors explain increased risk for additional neoplasia in persons with one neoplastic lesion.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAnimalsDNA DamageHumansMutationcancerDNA damageepidemiologyexponential equationfield effectgermline DNAionizing radiationmuonsmutation rateneoplasia distributionsomatic DNA

Identifiers

PMID40096640
PMCPMC11998479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.