ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Magnetization transfer explains most of the T
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicenter Assessment of Combined Brain and Cervical Spinal cord 3T MP2RAGE T1 Measurements for Reliable Tissue Microstructure Quantification.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Trial
- Effect of basis choice on quantitative parameter estimation in accelerated subspace reconstructions.Magnetic resonance letters · 2026Article
- Volumetric and Intrastructural Characterization of the Substantia Nigra Using Optimized Synthetic MR Images Derived From Quantitative T1 Maps at 3 T.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Quantitative MRI of pancreatic parenchyma in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: association with risk stratification based on guideline features.European radiology · 2026Article
- Variable flip angle T1 mapping for quantitative liver imaging at 0.55 T.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Mapping Neurodegenerative Changes in Clinically Uncertain Parkinsonian Syndrome Patients Using Fast MR Spin TomogrAphy in Time-Domain (MR-STAT) Relaxometry at 3T.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Abdominal TMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Sensitivity of LiteratureNMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Technical Development and Implementation of 3D-QALAS on a 1.5T MR-Linac for the Brain: A Prospective R-IDEAL Stage 0/1 Technology Development Report.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Rapid 3D whole-brain high-resolution TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Functional, Structural, and AI-Based MRI Analysis: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Sensitivity of literatureArXiv · 2025Article
- Efficient estimation of gadolinium-based contrast agent concentration using transient-state keyhole MR-STAT.Medical physics · 2025Article
- MRI acquisition and reconstruction cookbook: recipes for reproducibility, served with real-world flavour.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo identify the predominant source of the
methods25
resultsMono-exponential simulations suggest good inter-method reproducibility and fail to explain the highly variable
conclusionThe results suggest that a mono-exponential model does not adequately describe longitudinal relaxation in biological tissue. Therefore,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.