SynthesisAging2025
Sildenafil and risk of Alzheimer disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hospitalization with infections and risk of Dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Aging · 2025Pooled it
- Boosting Neurogenesis as a Strategy in Treating Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer Disease (AD) affects more than 50 million people worldwide, with 10 million new diagnosis each year. The link between Sildenafil, a Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitor, and risk of AD has been debated. We conducted the first meta-analysis on the association between Sildenafil use and risk of AD.
methodsWe searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception to March 11, 2024 to identify cohort, case-control studies comparing the frequency of AD in patients taking Sildenafil with those without. We computed risk ratios (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) with accompanying 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) for each study, and pooled the results using a random-effects meta-analysis.
resultsOut of 415 studies that were screened initially, 5 studies comprising 885,380 patients were included for analysis. Sildenafil use was associated with a reduced risk of developing AD by two-fold compared to non-use (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.27-0.82, p<0.001). There was a similar association in risk reduction of AD in patients on PDE5 inhibitors compared to non-use (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.38-0.80, p=0.002).
conclusionsOur meta-analysis showed that the use of Sildenafil is associated with a reduced risk of developing AD by two-fold. Further randomized control trials to ascertain the effect of Sildenafil on AD pathology would be useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.