ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Time to First Fix Robustness of Global Navigation Satellite Systems: Comparison Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Hernando-Ramiro et al. Time to First Fix Robustness of Global Navigation Satellite Systems: Comparison Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The time to first fix (TTFF) measures the time elapsed by a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver from switch-on to provision of a navigation solution. This parameter is crucial for applications where a position, within an acceptable error, is needed as soon as possible after turning the device on. The quality of the TTFF depends mainly on the receiver, the environment, and the GNSS satellites employed. Although all four available GNSSs (BeiDou, Galileo, GLONASS, and GPS) are complementary, their constellations and signals differ, providing different TTFF performances. This becomes even more relevant in hostile environments, where the TTFF degrades from nominal results. In this work, the robustness of the signals of the four GNSSs against different levels of harshness and its influence on the TTFF performance are evaluated in a comparative way. For this purpose, a typical scenario for mass-market GNSS applications, involving cold-start conditions, single-frequency signals, and a low-cost receiver, is considered. The results indicate that GPS provides the most robust TTFF, followed by GLONASS (although at the expense of positioning accuracy), BeiDou, and Galileo, in that order.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.