Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40096480›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Time to First Fix Robustness of Global Navigation Satellite Systems: Comparison Study.

Carlos Hernando-Ramiro, Óscar Gamallo-Palomares, Javier Junquera-Sánchez, José Antonio Gómez-Sánchez

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlos Hernando-RamiroSpanish National Institute for Aerospace Technology (INTA), Carretera de Ajalvir, km 4, 28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1798-1303
Óscar Gamallo-PalomaresSpanish National Institute for Aerospace Technology (INTA), Carretera de Ajalvir, km 4, 28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Spain.ORCID 0009-0008-9734-5561
Javier Junquera-SánchezSpanish National Institute for Aerospace Technology (INTA), Carretera de Ajalvir, km 4, 28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4597-6539
José Antonio Gómez-SánchezSpanish National Institute for Aerospace Technology (INTA), Carretera de Ajalvir, km 4, 28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Spain.ORCID 0009-0009-2351-7823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The time to first fix (TTFF) measures the time elapsed by a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver from switch-on to provision of a navigation solution. This parameter is crucial for applications where a position, within an acceptable error, is needed as soon as possible after turning the device on. The quality of the TTFF depends mainly on the receiver, the environment, and the GNSS satellites employed. Although all four available GNSSs (BeiDou, Galileo, GLONASS, and GPS) are complementary, their constellations and signals differ, providing different TTFF performances. This becomes even more relevant in hostile environments, where the TTFF degrades from nominal results. In this work, the robustness of the signals of the four GNSSs against different levels of harshness and its influence on the TTFF performance are evaluated in a comparative way. For this purpose, a typical scenario for mass-market GNSS applications, involving cold-start conditions, single-frequency signals, and a low-cost receiver, is considered. The results indicate that GPS provides the most robust TTFF, followed by GLONASS (although at the expense of positioning accuracy), BeiDou, and Galileo, in that order.

Indexed as

cold startglobal navigation satellite system (GNSS)low-cost receivermass-market applicationssignal attenuationsingle frequencytime to first fix

Identifiers

PMID40096480
PMCPMC11902767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.