Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40096438›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Detection of Anomalies in Data Streams Using the LSTM-CNN Model.

Agnieszka Duraj, Piotr S Szczepaniak, Artur Sadok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Agnieszka DurajInstitute of Information Technology, Lodz University of Technology, al. Politechniki 8, 93-590 Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3047-6662
Piotr S SzczepaniakInstitute of Information Technology, Lodz University of Technology, al. Politechniki 8, 93-590 Łódź, Poland.
Artur SadokNESC Sp. z o.o., ul. Wojskowa 6/B1, 60-792 Poznań, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of selected deep learning methods applied to anomaly detection in data streams. The anomaly detection results obtained on the popular Yahoo! Webscope S5 dataset are used for the computational experiments. The two commonly used and recommended models in the literature, which are the basis for this analysis, are the following: the LSTM and its more complicated variant, the LSTM autoencoder. Additionally, the usefulness of an innovative LSTM-CNN approach is evaluated. The results indicate that the LSTM-CNN approach can successfully be applied for anomaly detection in data streams as its performance compares favorably with that of the two mentioned standard models. For the performance evaluation, the F1score is used.

Indexed as

anomaliesdeep learning methodsLSTMoutliers

Identifiers

PMID40096438
PMCPMC11902827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.