Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40096411›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

IRFNet: Cognitive-Inspired Iterative Refinement Fusion Network for Camouflaged Object Detection.

Guohan Li, Jingxin Wang, Jianming Wei, Zhengyi Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guohan LiShanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201210, China.
Jingxin WangShanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201210, China.
Jianming WeiShanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201210, China.
Zhengyi XuShanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201210, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6934-3130

Funding

Youth Innovation Promotion Association 2021289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Camouflaged Object Detection (COD) aims to identify objects that are intentionally concealed within their surroundings through appearance, texture, or pattern adaptations. Despite recent advances, extreme object-background similarity causes existing methods struggle with accurately capturing discriminative features and effectively modeling multiscale patterns while preserving fine details. To address these challenges, we propose Iterative Refinement Fusion Network (IRFNet), a novel framework that mimics human visual cognition through progressive feature enhancement and iterative optimization. Our approach incorporates the following: (1) a Hierarchical Feature Enhancement Module (HFEM) coupled with a dynamic channel-spatial attention mechanism, which enriches multiscale feature representations through bilateral and trilateral fusion pathways; and (2) a Context-guided Iterative Optimization Framework (CIOF) that combines transformer-based global context modeling with iterative refinement through dual-branch supervision. Extensive experiments on three challenging benchmark datasets (CAMO, COD10K, and NC4K) demonstrate that IRFNet consistently outperforms fourteen state-of-the-art methods, achieving improvements of 0.9-13.7% across key metrics. Comprehensive ablation studies validate the effectiveness of each proposed component and demonstrate how our iterative refinement strategy enables progressive improvement in detection accuracy.

Indexed as

attention mechanismcamouflaged object detectioncomputer visioncross-level feature fusioniterative refinementobject detection

Identifiers

PMID40096411
PMCPMC11902440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.