ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Development of a Software and Hardware Complex for Monitoring Processes in Production Systems.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The article presents a detailed exposition of a hardware-software complex that has been developed for the purpose of enhancing the productivity of accounting for the state of the production process. This complex facilitates the automation of the identification of parts in production containers and the utilisation of supplementary markers. The complex comprises a mini computer (system unit in industrial version) with connected cameras (IP or WEB), a communication module with LED and signal lamps, and developed software. The cascade algorithm developed for the detection of labels and objects in containers employs trained convolutional neural networks (YOLO and VGG19), thereby enhancing the recognition accuracy while concurrently reducing the size of the training sample for neural networks. The efficacy of the developed system was assessed through laboratory experimentation, which yielded experimental results demonstrating 93% accuracy in detail detection using the developed algorithm, in comparison to the 72% accuracy achieved through the utilisation of the traditional approach employing a single neural network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.