ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Development and Validation of a Novel Smartphone Application to Detect Postural Instability.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reliability of a Home-Based Smartphone Balance Assessment in Healthy Middle-Aged and Older Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Exploratory Analysis of Postural Control in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using a Smartphone IMU Sensor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dynamic Gait Stability Estimated Using One or Two Inertial Measurement Units Worn on the Human Body.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional assessments of balance and postural control often face challenges related to accessibility, cost, subjectivity, and inter-rater reliability. With advancements in technology, smartphones equipped with inertial measurement units (IMUs) are emerging as a promising tool for assessing postural control, measuring both static and dynamic motion. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel smartphone application by comparing it with research-grade posturography instruments, including motion capture and force plate systems to establish construct- and criterion-related validity. Twenty-two participants completed the quiet stance under varying visual (eyes open-EO; eyes closed-EC) and surface (Firm vs. Foam) conditions, with data collected from the smartphone, force plate, and motion capture systems. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Pearson correlation coefficients assessed the reliability and validity for all outcome measures (sway area and sway velocity). The results demonstrated reliability, with strong validity between the devices. A repeated-measures ANOVA found no significant differences between the devices. Postural outcomes revealed the significant main effects of both the visual (EO vs. EC) and surface (Firm vs. Foam) conditions. In conclusion, the study demonstrated the validity, sensitivity, and accuracy of the custom-designed smartphone app, offering the potential for bridging the gap between at-home and clinical balance assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.