ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Utilising Inertial Measurement Units and Force-Velocity Profiling to Explore the Relationship Between Hamstring Strain Injury and Running Biomechanics.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stability of Rowing Technique and Specificity of Training Load: A Pilot Longitudinal Study in Young Athletes.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Wearable Technology and Sensors for Healthcare and Wellbeing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to retrospectively and prospectively explore associations between running biomechanics and hamstring strain injury (HSI) using field-based technology. Twenty-three amateur sprinters performed 40 m maximum-effort sprints and then underwent a one-year injury surveillance period. For the first 30 m of acceleration, sprint mechanics were quantified through force-velocity profiling. In the upright phase of the sprint, an inertial measurement unit (IMU) system measured sagittal plane pelvic and hip kinematics at the point of contact (POC), as well as step and stride time. Cross-sectional analysis revealed no differences between participants with a history of HSI and controls except for anterior pelvic tilt (increased pelvic tilt on the injured side compared to controls). Prospectively, two participants sustained HSIs in the surveillance period; thus, the small sample size limited formal statistical analysis. A review of cohort percentiles, however, revealed both participants scored in the higher percentiles for variables associated with a velocity-oriented profile. Overall, this study may be considered a feasibility trial of novel technology, and the preliminary findings present a case for further investigation. Several practical insights are offered to direct future research to ultimately inform HSI prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.