ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An IoT-Enabled Wearable Device for Fetal Movement Detection Using Accelerometer and Gyroscope Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lightweight Deep Learning Approaches on Edge Devices for Fetal Movement Monitoring.Biosensors · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Counting fetal movements is essential for assessing fetal health, but manually recording these movements can be challenging and inconvenient for pregnant women. This study presents a wearable device designed to detect fetal movements across various settings, both within and outside medical facilities. The device integrates accelerometer and gyroscope sensors with Internet of Things (IoT) technology to accurately differentiate between fetal and non-fetal movements. Data were collected from 35 pregnant women at Suranaree University of Technology (SUT) Hospital. This study evaluated ten signal extraction methods, six machine learning algorithms, and four feature selection techniques to enhance classification performance. The device utilized Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) for feature selection and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) with PSO hyper-tuning. It achieved a sensitivity of 90.00%, precision of 87.46%, and an F1-score of 88.56%, reflecting commendable results. The IoT-enabled technology facilitated continuous monitoring with an average latency of 423.6 ms. It ensured complete data integrity and successful transmission, with the capability to operate continuously for up to 48 h on a single charge. The findings substantiate the efficacy of the proposed approach in detecting fetal movements, thereby demonstrating a practical and valuable technology for fetal movement detection applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.