ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Enhanced U-Net for Infant Brain MRI Segmentation: A (2+1)D Convolutional Approach.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Infant Brain MR Image Segmentation Method with Attention Mechanism, Multi-Resolution Deep Supervision and Class Weight Tuning Strategy.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfant brain tissue segmentation from MRI data is a critical task in medical imaging, particularly challenging due to the evolving nature of tissue contrasts in the early months of life. The difficulty increases as gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) intensities converge, making accurate segmentation challenging. This study aims to develop an improved U-net-based model to enhance the precision of automatic segmentation of cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF), GM, and WM in 10 infant brain MRIs using the iSeg-2017 dataset.
methodsThe proposed method utilizes a U-net architecture with (2+1)Dconvolutional layers and skip connections. Preprocessing includes intensity normalization using histogram alignment to standardize MRI data across different records. The model was trained on the iSeg-2017 dataset, which comprises T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI data from ten infant subjects. Cross-validation was performed to evaluate the model's segmentation performance.
resultsThe model achieved an average accuracy of 92.2%, improving on previous methods by 0.7%. Sensitivity, precision, and Dice similarity scores were used to evaluate the performance, showing high levels of accuracy across different tissue types. The model demonstrated a slight bias toward misclassifying GM and WM, indicating areas for potential improvement.
conclusionsThe results suggest that the U-net architecture is highly effective in segmenting infant brain tissues from MRI data. Future work will explore enhancements such as attention mechanisms and dual-network processing for further improving segmentation accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.