ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Enhancing Slip, Trip, and Fall Prevention: Real-World Near-Fall Detection with Advanced Machine Learning Technique.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Slips, trips, and falls (STFs) are a major occupational hazard that contributes significantly to workplace injuries and the associated financial costs. The application of traditional fall detection techniques in the real world is limited because they are usually based on simulated falls. By using kinematic data from real near-fall incidents that occurred in physically demanding work environments, this study overcomes this limitation and improves the ecological validity of fall detection algorithms. This study systematically tests several machine-learning architectures for near-fall detection using the Prev-Fall dataset, which consists of high-resolution inertial measurement unit (IMU) data from 110 workers. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), residual networks (ResNets), convolutional long short-term memory networks (convLSTMs), and InceptionTime models were trained and evaluated over a range of temporal window lengths using a neural architecture search. High-validation F1 scores were achieved by the best-performing models, particularly CNNs and InceptionTime, indicating their effectiveness in near-fall classification. The need for more contextual variables to increase robustness was highlighted by recurrent false positives found in subsequent tests on previously unobserved occupational data, especially during biomechanically demanding activities such as bending and squatting. Nevertheless, our findings suggest the applicability of machine-learning-based STF prevention systems for workplace safety monitoring and, more generally, applications in fall mitigation. To further improve the accuracy and generalizability of the system, future research should investigate multimodal data integration and improved classification techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.