ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Comparative Study of Plantar Pressure and Inertial Sensors for Cross-Country Ski Classification Using Deep Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of LSTM-CNN in skiing action recognition under artificial intelligence technology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work presents a comparative study of low cost and low invasiveness sensors (plantar pressure and inertial measurement units) for classifying cross-country skiing techniques. A dataset was created for symmetrical comparative analysis, with data collected from skiers using instrumented insoles that measured plantar pressure, foot angles, and acceleration. A deep learning model based on CNN and LSTM was trained on various sensor combinations, ranging from two specific pressure sensors to a full multisensory array per foot incorporating 4 pressure sensors and an inertial measurement unit with accelerometer, magnetometer, and gyroscope. Results demonstrate an encouraging performance with plantar pressure sensors and classification accuracy closer to inertial sensing. The proposed approach achieves a global average accuracy of 94% to 99% with a minimal sensor setup, highlighting its potential for low-cost and precise technique classification in cross-country skiing and future applications in sports performance analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.