ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparative Analysis of YOLO Series Algorithms for UAV-Based Highway Distress Inspection: Performance and Application Insights.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DAN-YOLO-L: a lightweight YOLO approach for efficient infrared small object detection from UAV perspectives.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Influence of localized roadway surface obstacles on vehicular emissions under real-world urban driving conditions.Frontiers in big data · 2026Article
- Vehicle Recognition and Driving Information Detection with UAV Video Based on Improved YOLOv5-DeepSORT Algorithm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Established unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) highway distress detection (HDD) faces the dual challenges of accuracy and efficiency, this paper conducted a comparative study on the application of the YOLO (You Only Look Once) series of algorithms in UAV-based HDD to provide a reference for the selection of models. YOLOv5-l and v9-c achieved the highest detection accuracy, with YOLOv5-l performing well in mean and classification detection precision and recall, while YOLOv9-c showed poor performance in these aspects. In terms of detection efficiency, YOLOv10-n, v7-t, and v11-n achieved the highest levels, while YOLOv5-n, v8-n, and v10-n had the smallest model sizes. Notably, YOLOv11-n was the best-performing model in terms of combined detection efficiency, model size, and computational complexity, making it a promising candidate for embedded real-time HDD. YOLOv5-s and v11-s were found to balance detection accuracy and model lightweightness, although their efficiency was only average. When comparing t/n and l/c versions, the changes in the backbone network of YOLOv9 had the greatest impact on detection accuracy, followed by the network depth_multiple and width_multiple of YOLOv5. The relative compression degrees of YOLOv5-n and YOLOv8-n were the highest, and v9-t achieved the greatest efficiency improvement in UAV HDD, followed by YOLOv10-n and v11-n.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.