ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Pareto Front Transformation in the Decision-Making Process for Spectral and Energy Efficiency Trade-Off in Massive MIMO Systems.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a method of choosing a single solution in the Pareto Optimal Front of the multi-objective problem of the spectral and energy efficiency trade-off in Massive MIMO (Multiple Input, Multiple Output) systems. It proposes the transformation of the group of non-dominated alternatives using the Box-Cox transformation with values of λ < 1 so that the graph with a complex shape is transformed into a concave graph. The Box-Cox transformation solves the selection bias shown by the decision-making algorithms in the non-concave part of the Pareto Front. After the transformation, four different MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) algorithms were implemented and compared: SAW (Simple Additive Weighting), TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), PROMITHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations) and VIKOR (Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje). The simulations showed that the best value of the λ parameter is 0, and the MCDM algorithms which explore the Pareto Front completely for different values of weights of the objectives are VIKOR as well as SAW and TOPSIS when they include the Max-Min normalization technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.