ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Imbalanced Power Spectral Generation for Respiratory Rate and Uncertainty Estimations Based on Photoplethysmography Signal.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Respiratory rate (RR) changes in the elderly can indicate serious diseases. Thus, accurate estimation of RRs for cardiopulmonary function is essential for home health monitoring systems. However, machine learning (ML) algorithm errors embedded in health monitoring systems can be problematic in medical decision-making because some data have much larger sample sizes in the training set than others. This difference in sample size implies biosignal data imbalance. Therefore, we propose a novel methodology that combines bootstrap-based imbalanced continuous power spectral generation (IPSG) with ML approaches to estimate RRs and uncertainty to address data imbalance. The sample differences between normal breathing (12-20 breaths per minute (brpm)), dyspnea (≥20 brpm), and hypopnea (<8 brpm) show significant data imbalance, which can affect the learning of ML algorithms. Hence, the normal breathing part with a large amount of data is well-trained. In contrast, the dyspnea and hypopnea parts with relatively fewer data are not well-trained, and this data imbalance makes it difficult to estimate the reference variables of the actual dyspnea and hypopnea data parts, thus generating significant errors. Hence, we apply ML models by mixing artificial feature curves generated using a bootstrap model with the original feature curves to estimate RRs and solve this problem. As a result, the nonparametric bootstrap approach significantly increases the number of artificial feature curves. The generated artificial feature curves are selectively utilized in the highly imbalanced parts. Therefore, we confirm that IPSG is efficiently trained to predict the complex nonlinear relationship between the feature vectors obtained from the photoplethysmography signal and the reference RR. The proposed methodology shows more accurate prediction performance and uncertainty. Combining the proposed Gaussian process regression (GPR) with IPSG based on the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center dataset, the mean absolute error of the RR is 0.79 and 1.47 brpm. Our approach achieves high stability and accuracy by randomly mixing original and artificial feature curves. The proposed GPR-IPSG model can improve the performance of clinical home-based monitoring systems and design a reliable framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.