ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Compact Orthosis Compliance Monitoring Device Using Pressure Sensors and Accelerometers: Design and Proof-of-Concept Testing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practicality of Using Pressure Sensors and Accelerometers to Quantify Hand Orthosis Compliance at Home.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biomimetic Strategies in Orthosis Design: A Scoping Review of Biological Abstraction and Functional Translation.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Early Rehabilitation Versus Conventional Approaches in Post-Traumatic Hand Injuries with Multiple Lesions: Clinical Outcomes and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring orthosis compliance using patient diaries is subjective, as patients can overestimate their levels of device use. An objective way to monitor compliance is required because if an orthotic prescription is not followed, the orthosis will not work as intended. This study aimed to develop and validate a device that monitors orthosis compliance objectively using pressure and acceleration. Fifteen participants were recruited to test the device's ability to estimate wear time during the performance of several grip patterns and whilst completing selected activities of daily living. Sensor threshold values were used to discern whether users were wearing their orthosis or not. No differences between pressure sensor and accelerometer-based wear time estimations were found. The device's pressure-based wear time estimations were found to have a specificity of 92.7 ± 16.4% and sensitivity of 74.0 ± 41.3%, whilst accelerometer-based wear time estimates had a specificity of 66.1 ± 34.7% and sensitivity of 86.2 ± 8.0%. This study successfully demonstrated the feasibility of monitoring hand orthosis compliance using pressure or acceleration. This device has the potential to provide insight into the effectiveness of both existing and novel orthotics, benefitting both clinical practice and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.