Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40096178›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Predictive reward-prediction errors of climbing fiber inputs integrate modular reinforcement learning with supervised learning.

Huu Hoang, Shinichiro Tsutsumi, Masanori Matsuzaki, Masanobu Kano, Keisuke Toyama, Kazuo Kitamura, Mitsuo Kawato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huu HoangNeural Information Analysis Laboratories, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1463-8323
Shinichiro TsutsumiLaboratory for Multi-scale Biological Psychiatry, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8926-2047
Masanori MatsuzakiDepartment of Physiology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masanobu KanoDepartment of Neurophysiology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Keisuke ToyamaNeural Information Analysis Laboratories, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan.
Kazuo KitamuraDepartment of Neurophysiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Mitsuo KawatoComputational Neuroscience Laboratories, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Agency (ATLA)Grants-in-Aid for Transformative Research AreasInnovative Science and Technology Initiative for SecurityJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)Scientific Research in Innovative Areas
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the cerebellum is typically associated with supervised learning algorithms, it also exhibits extensive involvement in reward processing. In this study, we investigated the cerebellum's role in executing reinforcement learning algorithms, with a particular emphasis on essential reward-prediction errors. We employed the Q-learning model to accurately reproduce the licking responses of mice in a Go/No-go auditory-discrimination task. This method enabled the calculation of reinforcement learning variables, such as reward, predicted reward, and reward-prediction errors in each learning trial. Through tensor component analysis of two-photon Ca2+ imaging data from more than 6,000 Purkinje cells, we found that climbing fiber inputs of the two distinct components, which were specifically activated during Go and No-go cues in the learning process, showed an inverse relationship with predictive reward-prediction errors. Assuming bidirectional parallel-fiber Purkinje-cell synaptic plasticity, we constructed a cerebellar neural-network model with 5,000 spiking neurons of granule cells, Purkinje cells, cerebellar nuclei neurons, and inferior olive neurons. The network model qualitatively reproduced distinct changes in licking behaviors, climbing-fiber firing rates, and their synchronization during discrimination learning separately for Go/No-go conditions. We found that Purkinje cells in the two components could develop specific motor commands for their respective auditory cues, guided by the predictive reward-prediction errors from their climbing fiber inputs. These results indicate a possible role of context-specific actors in modular reinforcement learning, integrating with cerebellar supervised learning capabilities.

Indexed as

CerebellumModels, NeurologicalReinforcement, PsychologyRewardSupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsAnimalsComputational BiologyMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPurkinje Cells

Identifiers

PMID40096178
PMCPMC11957396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.