ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Improved MTF Measurement of Medical Flat-Panel Detectors Based on a Slit Model.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the development, evaluation, and application of medical flat-panel detectors, the modulation transfer function (MTF) is crucial, as it reflects the device's ability to restore detailed information. Medical flat-panel detectors encompass both image data acquisition and digitization processes, and detectors with varying pixel sizes exhibit differing capabilities for observing details. Accurately quantifying MTF is a critical challenge. The complexity of MTF calculation, combined with unclear principles and details, may result in erroneous outcomes, thereby misleading research and decision-making processes. This paper presents an improved MTF oversampling method based on the slit model. MTF testing is conducted under various sample conditions and using different focal spot diameters of the X-ray tube to analyze the impact of focal spot size. High-precision tungsten plates and fixtures are designed and fabricated, and MTF results with varying line spread function (LSF) sampling intervals are compared. The results demonstrate that the improved slit model offers distinct advantages, with MTF measurements achieving 92.4% of the ideal value. Compared to traditional tungsten edge and point (aperture) model testing methods, the accuracy of the proposed method is improved by 5-13%. The optimal sampling interval is approximately 1/29 of the pixel pitch, offering a more accurate method for evaluating detector performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.