ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Sensitivity Analysis of Long Short-Term Memory-Based Neural Network Model for Vehicle Yaw Rate Prediction.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, the application of artificial neural network models has become increasingly widespread in the automotive industry; however, the sensitivity analysis of these models is often neglected. This shortfall poses significant risks in safety-critical applications, where the reliability of models under varying conditions is of critical importance. This study focuses on the sensitivity analysis of a long short-term memory neural network model, previously published by us, designed to predict the future yaw rates of vehicles. Our research aimed to determine the minimum amount of data required for effective model training and to conduct a comprehensive sensitivity analysis, examining the performance and applicability of the trained model under varying tire pressures, different passenger loads, and different passenger configurations. Additionally, we investigated whether the trained model could be applied to other vehicle types. Our results indicated that the vehicle weight distribution was the most influential factor affecting the accuracy of the model. Nonetheless, the model's predictive error remained consistently within the safety thresholds defined by the standards under all tested conditions. Our experiments and analyses were performed using over 7.5 h of data collected under real-world conditions, which will be freely available to the research community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.