ArticlePloS one2025
Finite element analysis of the lens profile during accommodation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ciliary Zonule of the Human Eye: Structural and Mechanical Aspects.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Isolated human lens interferometric surface radius of curvatures: Implications for the mechanism of accommodation.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Biomechanical contributions to cataract development and implications for treatment strategies.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The magnitude of zonular forces required to change the shape of the human lens while focusing at near; i.e., accommodating, is still under investigation. During accommodation, ciliary muscle contraction induces a large increase in lens central optical power (COP). Here we used finite element (FE) analysis to evaluate the correlation between zonular forces and lens surface curvatures, central thickness, COP, overall lens shape and longitudinal spherical aberration (LSA). Fresh isolated lenses from donors aged 20, 24, 26, and 30 years were the basis for the analyses. Lens nucleus elastic moduli were specified as equal to, 2, 3, 10, 20 and 30 times greater than its cortex. When equatorial zonular (Ez) force was increased in 3.125 x 10-6 N steps while the anterior zonular (Az) and posterior zonular (Pz) forces were decreased in 3.125 x 10-6 N steps, COP was evaluated. Independent of the increase in lens nuclear modulus, less than 0.02 N of Ez force was required to increase COP 10 diopters while Az and Pz forces were decreased. The lens peripheral surfaces flattened, central surfaces steepened, central lens thickness increased, COP increased and LSA shifted in the negative direction consistent with published in vivo accommodation studies. The minimal Ez force required to obtain 10 diopters of COP increase supports that increasing Ez force with decreasing Az and Pz force is the basis for the change in lens shape during accommodation. Since the COP increase was independent of increasing elastic modulus of the nucleus, stiffening of the lens nucleus is not the etiology of the universal age-related decline in accommodative amplitude that results in presbyopia in the fifth decade of life. Increased Ez zonular tension during accommodation has implications for the development and potential treatments of myopia, glaucoma, presbyopia, cortical cataracts and accommodative intraocular lens design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.