ArticlePloS one2025
RRMSE-enhanced weighted voting regressor for improved ensemble regression.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensemble regression methods are widely used to improve prediction accuracy by combining multiple regression models, especially when dealing with continuous numerical targets. However, most ensemble voting regressors use equal weights for each base model's predictions, which can limit their effectiveness, particularly when there is no specific domain knowledge to guide the weighting. This uniform weighting approach doesn't consider that some models may perform better than others on different datasets, leaving room for improvement in optimizing ensemble performance. To overcome this limitation, we propose the RRMSE (Relative Root Mean Square Error) Voting Regressor, a new ensemble regression technique that assigns weights to each base model based on their relative error rates. By using an RRMSE-based weighting function, our method gives more importance to models that demonstrate higher accuracy, thereby enhancing the overall prediction quality. We tested the RRMSE Voting Regressor on six popular regression datasets and compared its performance with several state-of-the-art ensemble regression algorithms. The results show that the RRMSE Voting Regressor consistently achieves lower prediction errors than existing methods across all tested datasets. This improvement highlights the effectiveness of using relative error metrics for weighting in ensemble models. Our approach not only fills a gap in current ensemble regression techniques but also provides a reliable and adaptable method for boosting prediction performance in various machine learning tasks. By leveraging the strengths of individual models through smart weighting, the RRMSE Voting Regressor offers a significant advancement in the field of ensemble learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.