ArticlePloS one2025
A malware classification method based on directed API call relationships.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In-Memory Shellcode Runner Detection in Internet of Things (IoT) Networks: A Lightweight Behavioral and Semantic Analysis Framework.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence driven insights into smoking prediction using machine learning and clinical parameters.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In response to the growing complexity of network threats, researchers are increasingly turning to machine learning and deep learning techniques to develop advanced models for malware detection. Many existing methods that utilize Application Programming Interface (API) sequence instructions for malware classification often overlook the structural information inherent in these sequences. While some approaches consider the structure of API calls, they typically rely on the Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) framework, which tends to neglect the sequential nature of API interactions. To address these limitations, we propose a novel malware classification method that leverages the directed relationships within API sequences. Our approach models each API sequence as a directed graph, incorporating node attributes, structural information, and directional relationships. To effectively capture these features, we introduce First-order and Second-order Graph Convolutional Networks (FSGCN) to approximate the operations of a directed graph convolutional network (DGCN). The resulting directed graph embeddings from the FSGCN are then transformed into grayscale images and classified using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Additionally, to mitigate the effects of imbalanced datasets, we employ the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE), ensuring that underrepresented classes receive adequate attention during training. Our method has been rigorously evaluated through extensive experiments on two real-world malware datasets. The results demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our approach compared to traditional and graph-based malware classification techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.