ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Artificial Intelligence for Quality Defects in the Automotive Industry: A Systemic Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging technologies for data management and sharing to foster collaboration and implement data spaces.Data in brief · 2026Article
- Enhancing Product Quality in High-Variant Manufacturing: Combining Physics-Based Simulations and Data Science for Target Variable Estimation in an IoT- and Machine Learning-Driven Context.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Real-Time Defect Identification in Automotive Brake Calipers Using PCA-Optimized Feature Extraction and Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integration of Machine Vision and PLC-Based Control for Scalable Quality Inspection in Industry 4.0.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a revolutionary tool in the automotive sector, specifically in quality management and issue identification. This article presents a systematic review of AI implementations whose target is to enhance production processes within Industry 4.0 and 5.0. The main methods analyzed are deep learning, artificial neural networks, and principal component analysis, which improve defect detection, process automation, and predictive maintenance. The manuscript emphasizes AI's role in live auto part tracking, decreasing dependance on manual inspections, and boosting zero-defect manufacturing strategies. The findings indicate that AI quality control tools, like convolutional neural networks for computer vision inspections, considerably strengthen fault identification precision while reducing material scrap. Furthermore, AI allows proactive maintenance by predicting machine defects before they happen. The study points out the importance of incorporating AI solutions in actual manufacturing methods to ensure consistent adaptation to Industry 5.0 requirements. Future investigations should prioritize transparent AI approaches, cyber-physical system consolidation, and AI material enhancement for sustainable production. In general terms, AI is changing quality assurance in the automotive industry, improving efficiency, consistency, and long-term results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.