ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Effectiveness of Sound Field Corrections for High-Frequency Pressure Comparison Calibration of MEMS Microphones.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The calibration of Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) microphones remains a critical challenge due to their miniaturized geometry and sensitivity to non-uniform acoustic fields. This study presents an advanced calibration methodology that integrates Finite Element Method (FEM) simulations with experimental corrections to improve the accuracy of pressure comparison calibrations using active couplers. A key innovation is the incorporation of asymmetric acoustic field analysis, which systematically quantifies and corrects discrepancies arising from cavity geometry, sensor positioning, and resonance effects peculiar of MEMS microphones. The proposed approach significantly reduces measurement uncertainties, especially in the high-frequency range above 5 kHz, where standard calibration techniques face challenges in taking into account localized pressure variations. Furthermore, the implementation of a measurement set-up, which includes the insert voltage technique, allows for an accurate assessment of the preamplifier gain and minimizes systematic errors. Experimental validation shows that the refined calibration methodology produces highly reliable correction values, ensuring a robust performance over a wide frequency range (20 Hz-20 kHz). These advances establish a rigorous framework for standardizing the calibration of MEMS microphones, strengthening their applicability in acoustic monitoring, sound source localization, and environmental sensing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.