Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40095966›Full record

ArticlePsychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.)2025

A glance into the future of artificial intelligence-enhanced scalable personalized training: A response to Kopelovich, Brian, et al. (2025) and Kopelovich, Slevin, et al. (2025).

Sigal Zilcha-Mano

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sigal Zilcha-ManoDepartment of Psychology, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Haifa.ORCID 0000-0002-5645-4429

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The two articles by Kopelovich, Brian, et al. (2025) and Kopelovich, Slevin, et al. (2025) mark a new era in psychotherapy research and practice. The articles detail the development and validation of one of the first conversational artificial intelligence- (AI-) enhanced psychotherapy training tools, with profound implications for the future of clinical training. Following the new trail blazed by Kopelovich, Brian, et al. (2025) and Kopelovich, Slevin, et al. (2025), this commentary traces some of the most promising future directions for clinical training and research. In clinical training, trainees will be able to practice therapeutic skills and techniques with virtual clients before working with real ones. After mastering common therapeutic skills and treatment-specific techniques, they will begin treating real clients and receive detailed, immediate, and constructive AI-based feedback on their work to augment supervision sessions. Posttraining, clinicians can maintain and enhance their clinical expertise, acquire new skills, and incorporate the latest evidence-based knowledge into their practice through AI-based solutions. In research, it will be possible to explore the most effective techniques to be used by trainees and therapists at certain moments in a therapeutic session with individual patients, enabling the development of more precise and personalized therapeutic interventions. It will also be possible to explore the most effective trainee-specific supervision approaches to enhance a transformative experience and serve as a catalyst for the trainee's professional identity development within the supervisor-supervisee relationship, augmented by a systematic mapping of the trainee's strengths and areas for improvement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePsychotherapyClinical CompetenceHumans

Identifiers

PMID40095966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.