Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40095739›Full record

ReviewChemSusChem2025

Will Iron Forge the Future of Metal-Air Batteries in Grid Scale Energy Storage?

Katerina Bogomolov, Yair Ein-Eli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemSusChem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katerina BogomolovDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 3200003, Israel.
Yair Ein-EliDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 3200003, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3823-4588

Funding

Israel Science Foundation (ISF) 1335/24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The community is exploring sustainable alternatives for grid-scale energy storage. Besides lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), such technologies with a focus on sustainability aspects offer only a limited solution for grid-scale energy storage. Rechargeable metal-air batteries (MABs) based on affordable abundant multivalent metal anodes in aqueous medium provide promising theoretical metrics, such as volumetric capacity, but do not completely fulfill their potential when scaled from lab to commercial products. Both the metal anode and the air cathode need to be addressed: corrosion, hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) during charging, and passivation all diminish the anode's effective volumetric energy density and shelf life, while the air cathode's challenges include sluggish kinetics, low efficiency, and poor stability. Nevertheless, this Perspective highlights iron-air MABs as an appealing sustainable alternative for grid-scale energy storage, since iron is abundant and affordable, recyclable, has multielectron reversible redox activity, historically rich experience in production and processing, and is safe to handle. Given that further research will be directed to exploring the composition and design of electrolytes and electrodes, it may lead to advances in scaling and commercialization, as well as reducing the environmental impact of secondary batteries utilized for grid-scale energy storage in the next decades.

Indexed as

Grid-Scale Energy StorageIron-Air BatteriesLIBs AlternativesMultivalent Metal AnodesSustainability

Identifiers

PMID40095739
PMCPMC12094147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.