ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Mechanical Protective Ventilation: New Paradigms in Thoracic Surgery.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refining Postoperative Intensive Care Triage After Anatomical Lung Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Perioperative Reassessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Hypoxia synergizes cGAS-STING activation and AKT1 phosphorylation to drive pulmonary inflammation in one-lung ventilation: therapeutic attenuation by RU.521 and MK2206.Journal of inflammation (London, England) · 2026Article
- Impact on Respiratory Mechanics of Uniportal-Biportal Robotic Lung Resection Without Capnothorax Versus Multiportal Approach With Capnothorax: A Prospective Cohort Observational Study.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Anesthetic Management of a Giant Thymolipoma Causing Near Total Lung Collapse: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One-lung ventilation (OLV) in thoracic anesthesia poses dual challenges: preventing hypoxemia and minimizing ventilator-associated lung injury (VALI). Advances such as fiberoptic bronchoscopy and improved anesthetic techniques have reduced hypoxemia, yet optimal management strategies remain uncertain. Protective ventilation, involving low tidal volumes (4-6 mL/kg), individualized PEEP, and selective alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARM), seek to balance oxygenation and lung protection. However, questions persist regarding the ideal application of PEEP and ARM, as well as their integration into clinical practice. As for PEEP and ARM, further research is needed to address key questions and establish new guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.