Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40095681›Full record

Trial reportClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Patients Undergoing Oesophageal Cancer Surgery Do Not Have Impaired Haemostasis.

Tua Gyldenholm, Nina Madsen, Niels Katballe, Daniel Willy Kjær, Thomas Decker Christensen, Anne-Mette Hvas

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IV
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tua GyldenholmDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3040-9486
Nina MadsenDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Niels KatballeDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Daniel Willy KjærDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thomas Decker ChristensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anne-Mette HvasFaculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundOesophagectomy is a major oncological surgical procedure. Previous studies have shown a wide range of bleeding during and after surgery, and it is unknown if perioperative bleeding associated with oesophagectomy is purely surgical in nature, or if it is exacerbated by impaired haemostasis. We aimed to perform a detailed investigation of the perioperative coagulation in patients undergoing oesophagectomy due to cancer.MethodsThe study was a prospective study including adult patients with adeno- or squamous cell carcinoma referred for intended curative oesophagectomy. Operative bleeding volume and blood transfusions were recorded. Blood samples were collected at three timepoints: before, at the end of surgery, and on postoperative day one. Dynamic global haemostasis was investigated employing thromboelastometry (ROTEM

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyHemostasisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studieshaemostasisoesophageal neoplasmsoesophagectomyplatelet aggregationthromboelastography

Identifiers

PMID40095681
PMCPMC11915300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.